2024-04-26
For a couple of years now, Iāve been posting things I learned as a way of cultivating curiosity.[0]
But this year Iāve stumbled upon a different sort of thing I want to train myself to notice: things I wish I knew.
I find myself somewhat embarrassed to post these. But why? Probably because I feel like if I were truly motivated, I would be able to figure them out.
I think this is the wrong instinct. Someone out there almost definitely knows the answer to them and thereās a chance they just swing along and tell me. In that case, Iām better off. And some of the most impactful projects Iāve seen first hand have begun with someone wondering, āwhy is this the way that it is?ā
Since sifting my thoughts for these, Iāve found them to be way harder to capture. Iāve had 2-3 hit me and then disappear, only for me to be unable to locate them again. This almost never happens to me with āthings I learned.ā I wonder why that is?
Now, for my first one:
I wish I understood how individual trust is converted into group/institutional trust and how group/institutional trust converts into societal trust. I feel like I have a good idea on how an individual creates or destroys trust, but donāt think I understand how it converts for a team the size of a small company (say ~25-40 people), let alone a large company (thousands of people) or a society. Say youāre the mayor of a small city and you think a high trust society is important. Is it possible to do anything to foster this? How does it work?
My hypothesis: I assume itās some combination of credibility, reliability, and lack of self interest. So when people see society work (e.g., civic institutions function well, utilizing judgment, being able to be counted on) and that individuals arenāt profiting at the expense of the group, civic trust goes up. But⦠I could be wrong. If you feel like you definitively understand this, reach out: jdilla.xyz at gmail dot com.
[0]: Iāll probably keep doing that, because why not? Itās super fun.
2024-03-27
From my friends at Duolingo:
The people that affectionately call their Prince William "Wills" and Ā£5 and Ā£10 notesĀ ~"fivers" and "tenners"~Ā are responsible for shortening "Association Football" to just "Assoc."āwhich, when written, looks like it might be pronounced "Assock."Ā (This "Association Football" name is the same as the FrenchĀ Football AssociationĀ in FIFA!) In late 1800s England, at Oxford, there was also a fad of addingĀ -erĀ to some words. And thus, "soccer" was born.
In England. š“ó §ó ¢ó „ó ®ó §ó æ